Re: Migrate to autoconf 2.72?

From: Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Aleksander Alekseev <aleksander(at)tigerdata(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Migrate to autoconf 2.72?
Date: 2025-12-01 10:50:24
Message-ID: CAFj8pRB5LkOnPjZQH9Tkm4KQW7bU1vF6UZJxWqYMwPT5pE52wA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

po 1. 12. 2025 v 11:42 odesílatel Aleksander Alekseev <
aleksander(at)tigerdata(dot)com> napsal:

> Hi Pavel,
>
> >> No, there is currently no agreed schedule for this.
> >
> > almost all extensions has not meson support still
>
> Extensions shouldn't necessarily be built using the same build system
> as the PG core. I can build PG using Meson and then install a 3rd
> party extension using `make install && make installcheck`. In other
> words, we can stop supporting Autotools for building the core without
> affecting extensions. Unless I'm missing something, of course.
>

But when you use autotools for extensions, then you still should to
maintain it.

>
> --
> Best regards,
> Aleksander Alekseev
>

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dilip Kumar 2025-12-01 10:52:17 Re: Proposal: Conflict log history table for Logical Replication
Previous Message Mihail Nikalayeu 2025-12-01 10:49:37 Re: Revisiting {CREATE INDEX, REINDEX} CONCURRENTLY improvements