Re: Schema variables - new implementation for Postgres 15

From: Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>
Cc: Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Jaime Casanova <jcasanov(at)systemguards(dot)com(dot)ec>, Erik Rijkers <er(at)xs4all(dot)nl>, Gilles Darold <gilles(at)darold(dot)net>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Schema variables - new implementation for Postgres 15
Date: 2021-11-17 06:32:31
Message-ID: CAFj8pRB19RsgNEO0303v=zetj8fV2-6DuXEXi2iYH-NpbwDETA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

po 15. 11. 2021 v 21:23 odesílatel Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>
napsal:

> On Mon, Nov 15, 2021 at 09:00:13PM +0100, Pavel Stehule wrote:
> > Thank you for review and fixes, I try to complete some version for next
> > work, and looks so your patch 0001 is broken
> >
> > gedit reports to me broken unicode \A0\A0\A0\A0\A0
> >
> > my last patch has 276KB and your patch has 293KB?
>
> On Mon, Nov 15, 2021 at 09:06:08PM +0100, Pavel Stehule wrote:
> > >
> > > my last patch has 276KB and your patch has 293KB?
> >
> > Please, can you resend your version of patch 0001?
>
> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20211106013904.GG17618@telsasoft.com
>
> 0001 is exactly your patch applied to HEAD, and 0002 are Tomas' changes
> relative to your patch.
>
> 0003 is my contribution on top. My intent is that you wouldn't apply
> 0001, but
> rather apply my 0003 on top of your existing branch, and then review
> 0002/0003,
> and then squish the changes into your patch.
>
> I see the 0xa0 stuff in your original patch before my changes, but I'm not
> sure
> what went wrong.
>
> Let me know if you have any issue applying my changes on top of your
> existing,
> local branch ?
>

It is ok, I was able to apply all your patches to my local branch

Regards

Pavel

>
> --
> Justin
>

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message vignesh C 2021-11-17 06:52:05 Re: Skipping logical replication transactions on subscriber side
Previous Message Amit Langote 2021-11-17 06:18:13 Re: pg_get_publication_tables() output duplicate relid