Re: Showing parallel status in \df+

From: Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Jim Nasby <Jim(dot)Nasby(at)bluetreble(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Rushabh Lathia <rushabh(dot)lathia(at)gmail(dot)com>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Masao Fujii <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Showing parallel status in \df+
Date: 2016-10-03 20:00:16
Message-ID: CAFj8pRB+n0PLc-ojMfFE+jMRgx46qQ=Uajk_+bczXnDrijO=7Q@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

2016-10-03 21:54 GMT+02:00 Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>:

> On Fri, Sep 30, 2016 at 8:47 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> > Well, alternatively, can we get a consensus for doing that? People
> > did speak against removing PL source code from \df+ altogether, but
> > maybe they're willing to reconsider if the alternative is doing nothing.
> >
> > Personally I'm on the edge of washing my hands of the whole thing...
>
> The hand-washing strategy has a lot to recommend it; this thread is
> going nowhere fast. I don't care enough to put up a big stink about
> the idea of removing PL source code from \df+ output, but it's not
> what I'd choose to do; let's call me -0 on that option.
>

I can write the patch - I am sure so cleaned \df+ output will be better
than what we have now.

Regards

Pavel

>
> --
> Robert Haas
> EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
> The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
>

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2016-10-03 20:03:31 Re: Showing parallel status in \df+
Previous Message Andres Freund 2016-10-03 19:55:16 Re: Removing link-time cross-module refs in contrib