Re: plpgsql - DECLARE - cannot to use %TYPE or %ROWTYPE for composite types

2016-03-16 16:50 GMT+01:00 Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>:

>
>
> 2016-03-16 16:46 GMT+01:00 Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com>:
>
>> On 03/15/2016 05:17 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> > In short, I think we should reject this implementation and instead try
>> > to implement the type operators we want in the core grammar's Typename
>> > production, from which plpgsql will pick it up automatically. That is
>> > going to require some other syntax than this. As I said, I'm not
>> > particularly pushing the function-like syntax I wrote upthread; but
>> > I want to see something that is capable of supporting all those features
>> > and can be extended later if we think of other type operators we want.
>>
>> +1
>>
>> Anyone want to argue against changing the status of this to Rejected or
>> at least Returned with feedback?
>>
>
> I would to reduce this patch to fix row type issue. There is not any
> disagreement. I'll send reduced patch today.
>
> Any other functionality is not 9.6 topic.
>

I played with the reduced patch, and the benefit without all other things
is negligible. It should be rejected.

Regards

Pavel

>
> Regards
>
> Pavel
>
>
>> Joe
>>
>> --
>> Crunchy Data - http://crunchydata.com
>> PostgreSQL Support for Secure Enterprises
>> Consulting, Training, & Open Source Development
>>
>>
>