Re: psql - add special variable to reflect the last query status

From: Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr>
Cc: PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: psql - add special variable to reflect the last query status
Date: 2017-06-28 08:10:18
Message-ID: CAFj8pRAxpGCscu0k6h9t6U_9vDK7Se=LVLMzKhhaSvTDToW4vA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

2017-06-28 10:04 GMT+02:00 Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr>:

>
> Hello Pavel,
>
> + if (success)
>> + {
>> + char *ntuples = PQcmdTuples(results);
>> + SetVariable(pset.vars, "ROW_COUNT", *ntuples ? ntuples : "0");
>> + SetVariable(pset.vars, "ERROR", "FALSE");
>> + }
>> + else
>> + {
>> + SetVariable(pset.vars, "ROW_COUNT", "0");
>> + SetVariable(pset.vars, "ERROR", "TRUE");
>> + }
>> +}
>>
>> It can be simplified
>>
>> SetVariable(pset.vars, "ROW_COUNT", success ? PQcmdTuples(results) : 0);
>>
>
> According to the documentation, PQcmdTuples returns "" in some cases and
> ISTM we want "0" instead for consistency, so that it is always a number. I
> rejected calling PQcmdTuples twice:
>
> ..., success && *PQcmdTuples(results) ? PQcmdTuples(results) : "0")
>
> Thus it makes the "if (success)" necessary for ROW_COUNT, and then it
> looked simpler to handle ERROR the same way.
>
> Now if the semantics is changed to put as row count whatever comes out of
> the function, even if not a count, then the code could indeed be simplified
> as you suggest.

Understand

Pavel

>
>
> --
> Fabien.
>

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Beena Emerson 2017-06-28 08:18:51 Re: Default Partition for Range
Previous Message Fabien COELHO 2017-06-28 08:04:30 Re: psql - add special variable to reflect the last query status