2015-11-22 23:54 GMT+01:00 Corey Huinker <corey(dot)huinker(at)gmail(dot)com>:
> What about pg_size_unpretty()?
>>
> I was going to suggest pg_size_ugly(), but unpretty does emphasize the
> inverse (rather than opposite) nature of the function.
>
"unpretty", "ugly" aren't good names
maybe pg_size_bytes or different approach
we can introduce data type - bytesize - default input/output is human
readable text - and conversion to bigint is implicit
Some like
select .. where pg_table_size(oid) > bytesize '3.5GB'
and instead pg_size_pretty(pg_table_size(oid)) we can write
pg_table_size(oid)::bytesize
Regards
Pavel