Re: jsonb generator functions

From: Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: jsonb generator functions
Date: 2014-10-16 11:55:28
Message-ID: CAFj8pRAwV_SN+T2qU=ojH0bZ3HQOD-4SExqnVJxxEkTx30Qo1Q@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

2014-10-15 23:49 GMT+02:00 Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>:

>
> On 10/15/2014 05:47 PM, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
>
>> Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>>
>> If we really want to change the name of json_object_two_arg, it
>>> would probably be best to change it NOW in 9.4 before it gets out
>>> into a production release at all.
>>>
>> Doesn't it require initdb? If so, I think it's too late now.
>>
>>
yes, it is too heavy argument.

ok

Pavel

>
> Yeah, you're right, it would.
>
> OK, forget that.
>
> cheers
>
> andrew
>

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Stephen Frost 2014-10-16 11:59:14 Re: Additional role attributes && superuser review
Previous Message Stephen Frost 2014-10-16 11:44:48 Re: Additional role attributes && superuser review