Re: proposal: multiple psql option -c

Hi

2015-11-05 22:23 GMT+01:00 Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>:

> On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 3:53 PM, Catalin Iacob <iacobcatalin(at)gmail(dot)com>
> wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 5:27 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
> wrote:
> >>> I wrote some text. But needs some work of native speaker.
> >>
> >> It does. It would be nice if some kind reviewer could help volunteer
> >> to clean that up.
> >
> > I'll give it a go sometime next week.
>
> Thanks, that would be great!
>
> I recommend comparing the section on -c and the section on -C, and
> probably updating the former as well as adjusting the wording of the
> latter. We don't want to repeat all the same details in both places,
> but we hopefully want to give people a little clue that if they're
> thinking about using -c, they may wish to instead consider -C.
>

-g was replaced by -C option and some other required changes.

I have not idea about good long name. In this moment I used
"multi-command". Can be changed freely.

The name of this patch is same (although it doesn't use "group-command"
internally anymore) due better orientation.

Regards

Pavel

>
> --
> Robert Haas
> EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
> The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
>