Re: proposal: multiple psql option -c

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Catalin Iacob <iacobcatalin(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, Adam Brightwell <adam(dot)brightwell(at)crunchydatasolutions(dot)com>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, dinesh kumar <dineshkumar02(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: proposal: multiple psql option -c
Date: 2015-11-05 21:23:29
Message-ID: CA+TgmoYZGn4xYEmT67CQ-knc0kSoiauFbkWXSg0P2=rw3OjYWQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 3:53 PM, Catalin Iacob <iacobcatalin(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 5:27 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>>> I wrote some text. But needs some work of native speaker.
>>
>> It does. It would be nice if some kind reviewer could help volunteer
>> to clean that up.
>
> I'll give it a go sometime next week.

Thanks, that would be great!

I recommend comparing the section on -c and the section on -C, and
probably updating the former as well as adjusting the wording of the
latter. We don't want to repeat all the same details in both places,
but we hopefully want to give people a little clue that if they're
thinking about using -c, they may wish to instead consider -C.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2015-11-05 21:35:12 Re: Brain fade in gin_extract_jsonb_path()
Previous Message Robert Haas 2015-11-05 21:19:36 Re: extend pgbench expressions with functions