Re: [Proposal] Global temporary tables

From: Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: 曾文旌 <wenjing(dot)zwj(at)alibaba-inc(dot)com>
Cc: Prabhat Sahu <prabhat(dot)sahu(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, tushar <tushar(dot)ahuja(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Konstantin Knizhnik <k(dot)knizhnik(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, 蔡松露(子嘉) <zijia(at)taobao(dot)com>, "Cai, Le" <le(dot)cai(at)alibaba-inc(dot)com>
Subject: Re: [Proposal] Global temporary tables
Date: 2020-07-06 15:31:32
Message-ID: CAFj8pRAqML3Jpp3iYpGNPWepdz=SMjxLZQDKy0UNUSxtA8mLSA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi

čt 11. 6. 2020 v 4:13 odesílatel 曾文旌 <wenjing(dot)zwj(at)alibaba-inc(dot)com> napsal:

>
> 2020年6月9日 下午8:15,Prabhat Sahu <prabhat(dot)sahu(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> 写道:
>
>
>
> On Wed, Apr 29, 2020 at 8:52 AM 曾文旌 <wenjing(dot)zwj(at)alibaba-inc(dot)com> wrote:
>
>> 2020年4月27日 下午9:48,Prabhat Sahu <prabhat(dot)sahu(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> 写道:
>>
>> Thanks Wenjing, for the fix patch for previous issues.
>> I have verified the issues, now those fix look good to me.
>> But the below error message is confusing(for gtt2).
>>
>> postgres=# drop table gtt1;
>> ERROR: cannot drop global temp table gtt1 when other backend attached it.
>>
>> postgres=# drop table gtt2;
>> ERROR: cannot drop index idx2 on global temp table gtt2 when other
>> backend attached it.
>>
>> I feel the above error message shown for "DROP TABLE gtt2;" is a bit
>> confusing(looks similar to DROP INDEX gtt2;).
>> If possible, can we keep the error message simple as "ERROR: cannot
>> drop global temp table gtt2 when other backend attached it."?
>> I mean, without giving extra information for the index attached to that
>> GTT.
>>
>> Fixed the error message to make the expression more accurate. In v33.
>>
>
> Thanks Wenjing. We verified your latest patch(gtt_v33) focusing on all
> reported issues and they work fine.
> Thanks.
> --
>
>
> I'm very glad to hear such good news.
> I am especially grateful for your professional work on GTT.
> Please feel free to let me know if there is anything you think could be
> improved.
>
>
> Thanks.
>
>
> Wenjing
>

this patch needs rebase

Regards

Pavel

> With Regards,
> Prabhat Kumar Sahu
> EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
>
>
>

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2020-07-06 15:37:26 Re: [PATCH] postgres_fdw connection caching - cause remote sessions linger till the local session exit
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2020-07-06 15:29:42 Re: min_safe_lsn column in pg_replication_slots view