| From: | Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Dean Rasheed <dean(dot)a(dot)rasheed(at)gmail(dot)com>, Marko Tiikkaja <marko(at)joh(dot)to>, Jim Nasby <Jim(dot)Nasby(at)bluetreble(dot)com>, Petr Jelinek <petr(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: proposal: searching in array function - array_position |
| Date: | 2015-03-20 19:48:23 |
| Message-ID: | CAFj8pRAikQv9O72U35Z3KpgxFRRhgjYR2g0xu2DmaBX3tBukEg@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
2015-03-20 18:47 GMT+01:00 Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>:
> Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> > Pavel Stehule wrote:
> >> I am thinking, so it is ok - it returns a offset, not position.
>
> > So you can't use it as a subscript? That sounds unfriendly. Almost
> > every function using this will be subtly broken.
>
> I concur; perhaps "offset" was the design intention, but it's wrong.
> The result should be a subscript.
>
do you have any idea about name for this function? array_position is ok?
Regards
Pavel
>
> regards, tom lane
>
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Stephen Frost | 2015-03-20 19:49:50 | Re: Remove fsync ON/OFF as a visible option? |
| Previous Message | Greg Stark | 2015-03-20 19:40:53 | Re: Remove fsync ON/OFF as a visible option? |