From: | Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: proposal: PL/Pythonu - function ereport |
Date: | 2015-10-16 07:10:12 |
Message-ID: | CAFj8pRAgHLPS+N-_h7mWyy+EjXv72EVir5z8wHtQCskT8-wOFQ@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
2015-10-16 8:12 GMT+02:00 Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>:
> On 16 October 2015 at 02:47, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
> wrote:
>
> > postgres=# do $$
> > x = plpy.SPIError('Nazdarek');
> > x.spidata = (100, "Some detail", "some hint", None, None);
> > raise x;
> > $$ language plpythonu;
>
> Shouldn't that look more like
>
> raise plpy.SPIError(msg="Message", sqlstate="0P001", hint="Turn it on
> and off again") ?
>
postgres=# do $$
raise plpy.SPIError(msg="Message", sqlstate="0P001", hint="Turn it on and
off again");
$$ language plpythonu;
ERROR: TypeError: SPIError does not take keyword arguments
CONTEXT: Traceback (most recent call last):
PL/Python anonymous code block, line 2, in <module>
raise plpy.SPIError(msg="Message", sqlstate="0P001", hint="Turn it on
and off again");
PL/Python anonymous code block
Time: 1.193 ms
>
> Keyword args are very much the norm for this sort of thing. I recall
> them being pretty reasonable to deal with in the CPython API too, but
> otherwise a trivial Python wrapper in the module can easily adapt the
> interface.
>
>
postgres=# do $$
class cSPIError(plpy.SPIError):
def __init__( self, message, detail = None, hint = None):
self.spidata = (0, detail, hint, None, None,)
self.args = ( message, )
x = cSPIError('Nazdarek', hint = 'some hint')
raise x
$$ language plpythonu;
ERROR: cSPIError: Nazdarek
HINT: some hint
CONTEXT: Traceback (most recent call last):
PL/Python anonymous code block, line 8, in <module>
raise x
PL/Python anonymous code block
This code is working, so it needs explicit constructor for class SPIError
Regards
Pavel
>
>
> --
> Craig Ringer http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
> PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Etsuro Fujita | 2015-10-16 09:00:03 | Re: Foreign join pushdown vs EvalPlanQual |
Previous Message | Michael Paquier | 2015-10-16 07:08:29 | Re: Support for N synchronous standby servers - take 2 |