From: | Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi(dot)kyotaro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: IF (NOT) EXISTS in psql-completion |
Date: | 2017-01-31 05:56:39 |
Message-ID: | CAFj8pRAgC6rSbMy=qyrQNG4TKM=jqoj=xq2gQqVw5ij7V+z7pA@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
>
>
>
> 2017-01-31 6:51 GMT+01:00 Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>:
>
>>
>>
>> The current patch status was "waiting on author", but that's incorrect
>> as a new series of this patch has been sent. Please be careful with
>> the status of the CF app! I am moving it to next CF with "needs
>> review". Gerdan Santos has marked himself as a reviewer of the patch
>> but I saw no activity, so I have removed his name to not confuse
>> people looking for patches to review (that happens!).
>>
>
> I tested new set of these patches and I found some regressions there -
> mentioned in my last mail.
>
> Maybe I miss new update, bit I don't know about it.
>
Some infrastructure related patches (maybe 50%) from this set can be
committed now - the moving complete set of patches to next commitfest
generates generates lot of repeated useless work.
Regards
Pavel
> Regards
>
> Pavel
>
>> --
>> Michael
>>
>
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Michael Paquier | 2017-01-31 05:56:57 | Re: IF (NOT) EXISTS in psql-completion |
Previous Message | Pavel Stehule | 2017-01-31 05:53:16 | Re: IF (NOT) EXISTS in psql-completion |