| From: | Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | cb(at)df7cb(dot)de, Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: review: tab completion for set search_path TO |
| Date: | 2014-06-23 06:26:32 |
| Message-ID: | CAFj8pRAdOO7onxVeFrLkTshX9=1ke6JUDare1b+FuTRrghrbOw@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hello
I am sorry, I expected so review shold to start with new thread. I was
wrong, so next reviews I will use e existing threads
Regards
pavel
Dne 23. 6. 2014 7:39 "Michael Paquier" <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
napsal(a):
> On Sun, Jun 22, 2014 at 2:22 AM, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
> wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> this patch https://commitfest.postgresql.org/action/patch_view?id=1443
>> is trivial with zero risk.
>>
>> Patch is applicable without any issues, compilation was without any
>> issues too.
>>
> Just wondering: why creating a new thread for a review and not reply
> directly reply to the exiting one? This makes the review/patch submission
> flow rather complicated to follow.
> --
> Michael
>
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Kyotaro HORIGUCHI | 2014-06-23 06:49:00 | Re: pg_resetxlog to clear backup start/end locations. |
| Previous Message | Soroosh Sardari | 2014-06-23 05:53:38 | Add a filed to PageHeaderData |