| From: | Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Chapman Flack <chap(at)anastigmatix(dot)net>, Markus Winand <markus(dot)winand(at)winand(dot)at>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: PostgreSQL vs SQL/XML Standards |
| Date: | 2019-03-14 20:09:53 |
| Message-ID: | CAFj8pRAaGO5FX7bnP3E=mRssoK8y5T78x7jKy-vDiyS68L888Q@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi
pá 8. 3. 2019 v 19:44 odesílatel Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
napsal:
> On 2019-Mar-08, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
>
> > > Maybe we can call explicitly xmlFreeDoc instead xmlFreeNode
> > >
> > > some like
> > >
> > > if (cur_copy->type == XML_DOCUMENT_NODE)
> > > xmlFreeDoc((xmlDocPtr) cur_copy);
> > > else
> > > xmlFreeNode(cur_copy);
> > >
> > > This looks most correct fix for me. What do you think?
> >
> > Seems like that should work, yeah ...
>
> Something like this perhaps? Less repetitive ...
>
I looking to code
void (*nodefree) (xmlNodePtr) = NULL;
volatile xmlBufferPtr buf = NULL;
should not be "nodefree" volatile too?
Pavel
>
> --
> Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
> PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
>
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2019-03-14 20:18:37 | Re: PostgreSQL vs SQL/XML Standards |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2019-03-14 19:45:16 | Re: partitioned tables referenced by FKs |