Re: Implementation of global temporary tables?

From: Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
Cc: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Jim Nasby <Jim(dot)Nasby(at)bluetreble(dot)com>, Zhaomo Yang <zhy001(at)cs(dot)ucsd(dot)edu>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Kevin Grittner <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Implementation of global temporary tables?
Date: 2015-07-20 03:00:48
Message-ID: CAFj8pRANxHaM0zAcpaQiJaRvKUrZEmC=q0h5AZdk5vhvfCmheA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

2015-07-19 21:39 GMT+02:00 Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>:

> Pavel, All:
>
> Just to be clear, the idea of a global temp table is that the table def
> is available to all users, but the data is private to each session?
>

yes.

Pavel

>
> --
> Josh Berkus
> PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
> http://pgexperts.com
>

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Pavel Stehule 2015-07-20 03:02:57 Re: pg_dump quietly ignore missing tables - is it bug?
Previous Message Peter Geoghegan 2015-07-20 01:31:23 Re: Refactoring speculative insertion with unique indexes a little