Re: proposal: EXPLAIN ANALYZE formatting

From: Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: proposal: EXPLAIN ANALYZE formatting
Date: 2017-01-28 16:02:32
Message-ID: CAFj8pRAGjeg17t+yRkAoGmySzsv8Modu+F7X3uuZcRs7z7un5Q@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

2017-01-28 16:22 GMT+01:00 Peter Eisentraut <
peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>:

> On 1/28/17 2:36 AM, Pavel Stehule wrote:
> > Now EXPLAIN ANALYZE produce too wide rows for usage in presentations
> >
> > What do you think about possibility to implement >>optional<<
> > alternative formatting.
> >
> > Now:
> >
> > node name (estimation) (actual)
> >
> > Alternative:
> >
> > node name (estimation)
> > (actual)
>
> I think that could be useful, even outside of presentations.
>

There is another variant with less white space

node name
(estimation)
(actual)

Regards

Pavel

>
> --
> Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
> PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
>

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2017-01-28 16:09:36 Re: proposal: EXPLAIN ANALYZE formatting
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2017-01-28 15:22:32 Re: proposal: EXPLAIN ANALYZE formatting