Re: shoud be get_extension_schema visible?

From: Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
Cc: Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: shoud be get_extension_schema visible?
Date: 2023-03-08 05:08:32
Message-ID: CAFj8pRAFnBUtDGPVZw9wamwXJm9e=q6edpwJEbmTBLuGJwWinw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

st 8. 3. 2023 v 2:04 odesílatel Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
napsal:

> On Mon, Mar 06, 2023 at 04:44:59PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> > I can see why you'd want that, so OK from here to provide this routine
> > for external consumption. Let's first wait a bit and see if others
> > have any kind of objections or comments.
>
> Done this one as of e20b1ea.
>

Thank you very much

Pavel

> --
> Michael
>

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Geoghegan 2023-03-08 05:21:00 Re: Testing autovacuum wraparound (including failsafe)
Previous Message Nathan Bossart 2023-03-08 04:56:58 Re: optimize several list functions with SIMD intrinsics