documentation bug - missing info about unpackaged control files for extension

From: Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: documentation bug - missing info about unpackaged control files for extension
Date: 2012-04-15 10:47:12
Message-ID: CAFj8pRADpQvAeZjsZV6uswuKwhGLj7NdnVA-CZaYH_xZNa_HbA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hello

is somewhere documented sense of foo--unpackaged--version.sql files?

Regards

Pavel

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2012-04-15 10:52:25 Re: Clobbered parameter names via DECLARE in PL/PgSQL
Previous Message Simon Riggs 2012-04-15 10:02:37 Re: index-only scans vs. Hot Standby, round two