From: | Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: review: CHECK FUNCTION statement |
Date: | 2011-12-19 15:47:25 |
Message-ID: | CAFj8pRA3DcVSdZ_1TZ6kRuBjDm+rFoxHr=sZ+mfGf2s8=uwADg@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
2011/12/19 Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>:
> On 12/17/2011 04:00 PM, Pavel Stehule wrote:
>>
>> I use it for checking of my most large plpgsql project - it is about
>> 300KB plpgsql procedures - but this code is not free - and this module
>> helps to find lot of bugs.
>
>
> Great. If you continue to check against that regularly, that makes me feel
> better. I was guessing you had a large body of such source code around, and
> knowing it executed correctly against all of it improves my confidence here.
>
I am not alone
a subset is used in plpgsql_lint and I know about some commercial
subjects that use it too.
https://github.com/okbob/plpgsql_lint
but code in check function is little newer. It can interesting test
some code that is wroted by person with background from other db,
because they use a different patterns
I don't use a explicit cursors for example - on other hand, I use
exception intensively in my last project. We can ask people from
LedgerSMB about testing if somebody has contact
Regards
Pavel
>
> --
> Greg Smith 2ndQuadrant US greg(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com Baltimore, MD
> PostgreSQL Training, Services, and 24x7 Support www.2ndQuadrant.us
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Marti Raudsepp | 2011-12-19 15:52:40 | Re: Autonomous subtransactions |
Previous Message | Euler Taveira de Oliveira | 2011-12-19 15:41:52 | Re: Postgres 9.1: Adding rows to table causing too much latency in other queries |