Re: proposal GSoC 2015 task: Allow access to the database via HTTP

From: Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Вадим Горбачев <bmsdave(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: proposal GSoC 2015 task: Allow access to the database via HTTP
Date: 2015-03-25 05:51:43
Message-ID: CAFj8pRA++8VkFB2Kb-0-BMi8S+jpD_bBeCTUYRQh92Ec8KWLSg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

2015-03-24 21:19 GMT+01:00 Вадим Горбачев <bmsdave(at)gmail(dot)com>:

> I came across correspondences:
>
> http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAFjNrYu+Z1KfKt1..44K4pG69ou7fuHOw@mail.gmail.com
>
> http://www .
> posatgresql.org/message-id/9A28C8860F777E439AA12E8AEA7694F8FB8EAD@BPXM15GP.gisp.nec.co.jp
> as I understand, in this https://github.com/dobesv/restgres/project the
> idea of bgworker'a which listens to the specified port is already realized
> and processes http-inquiries = (
>
> why then this task still is in the TODO sheet?
>

because it is not in upstream yet ?

Pavel

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Noah Misch 2015-03-25 05:53:23 Re: Zero-padding and zero-masking fixes for to_char(float)
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2015-03-25 05:32:50 Re: Exposing PG_VERSION_NUM in pg_config