| From: | Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Relation extension scalability |
| Date: | 2016-01-28 11:27:07 |
| Message-ID: | CAFiTN-vcRc5uGFvyrhKWxPFYf7j=Zncko98tZrAF2ZhiZeEnMg@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 4:53 PM, Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> I did not find in regression in normal case.
> Note: I tested it with previous patch extend_num_pages=10 (guc parameter)
> so that we can see any impact on overall system.
>
Just forgot to mentioned That i have run pgbench read-write case.
S.F: 300
./pgbench -j $ -c $ -T 1800 -M Prepared postgres
Tested with 1,8,16,32,64 Threads and did not see any regression with patch.
--
Regards,
Dilip Kumar
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Yury Zhuravlev | 2016-01-28 11:27:43 | Re: Proposal:Use PGDLLEXPORT for libpq |
| Previous Message | Dilip Kumar | 2016-01-28 11:23:08 | Re: Relation extension scalability |