From: | Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> |
Cc: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, "Drouvot, Bertrand" <bdrouvot(at)amazon(dot)com>, Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, "pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "Schneider (AWS), Jeremy" <schnjere(at)amazon(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: logical decoding bug: segfault in ReorderBufferToastReplace() |
Date: | 2021-06-05 04:44:42 |
Message-ID: | CAFiTN-vSHa5w0g6YjYjP=q0ZkqgVGwZ2ksCmsSXZqzAKNYpyww@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-bugs pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers |
On Sat, Jun 5, 2021 at 5:41 AM Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> wrote:
>
> > This indicates that a toast record was present for that relation,
> > despite:
>
> Can you explain what it is you saw that indicates that a toast record
> was present for the relation? I may be misreading the code, but there's
> nothing obvious that says that if we reach there, then a toast datum
> exists anywhere for this relation. We only know that txn->toast_hash is
> set, but that could be because the transaction touched a toast record in
> some other table. Right?
Is this problem is related to the thread [1], where due to spec abort
the toast hash was not deleted and after that, if the next record is
for some other relation which is not having a toast table you will see
this error. There are a few other problems if the toast hash is not
cleaned due to spec abort. I have submitted patches with 2 approached
in that thread.
--
Regards,
Dilip Kumar
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Amit Kapila | 2021-06-05 06:42:49 | Re: logical decoding bug: segfault in ReorderBufferToastReplace() |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2021-06-05 00:21:22 | Re: BUG #17048: about trace_locks parameter problem |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2021-06-05 05:26:23 | pgsql: Fix subtransaction test for Python 3.10 |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2021-06-05 00:07:14 | pgsql: Fix postgres_fdw failure with whole-row Vars of type RECORD. |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2021-06-05 05:29:16 | Re: Python 3.10 breaks regression tests with traceback changes |
Previous Message | David Rowley | 2021-06-05 04:33:23 | Fix a few typos in brin_minmax_multi.c |