Re: Add sub-transaction overflow status in pg_stat_activity

From: Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Bossart, Nathan" <bossartn(at)amazon(dot)com>, Ashutosh Sharma <ashu(dot)coek88(at)gmail(dot)com>, Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Add sub-transaction overflow status in pg_stat_activity
Date: 2022-03-22 05:06:30
Message-ID: CAFiTN-vQAA2j6we-8wShxTpUYNdj5t_94G7=N1edeTw9iUbCMw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Mar 22, 2022 at 5:15 AM Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> wrote:

> There seems to be some agreement on this (I certainly do agree). Thus it seems
> we should mark the CF entry as rejected?
>
> It's been failing on cfbot for weeks... https://cirrus-ci.com/task/5289336424890368?logs=docs_build#L347

I have marked it rejected.

--
Regards,
Dilip Kumar
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Thomas Munro 2022-03-22 05:09:08 Re: Broken make dependency somewhere near win32ver.o?
Previous Message Thomas Munro 2022-03-22 05:03:31 Re: New Object Access Type hooks