From: | Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(dot)oss(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Petr Jelinek <petr(dot)jelinek(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: Decoding speculative insert with toast leaks memory |
Date: | 2021-05-27 04:36:15 |
Message-ID: | CAFiTN-vHmMm=Mq8VBhOO5NgKe1As914rdo0uMNxQrwELkHRFPw@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, May 27, 2021 at 9:47 AM Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, May 27, 2021 at 9:40 AM Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> True, but if you do this clean-up in ReorderBufferCleanupTXN then you
> don't need to take care at separate places. Also, toast_hash is stored
> in txn so it appears natural to clean it up in while releasing TXN.
Make sense, basically, IMHO we will have to do in TruncateTXN and
ReturnTXN as attached?
--
Regards,
Dilip Kumar
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
v1-0001-Cleanup-toast-hash.patch | text/x-patch | 1.2 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bharath Rupireddy | 2021-05-27 04:45:49 | Re: Parallel Inserts in CREATE TABLE AS |
Previous Message | Andrey Lepikhov | 2021-05-27 04:27:51 | Re: Asymmetric partition-wise JOIN |