Re: Parallel bitmap heap scan

From: Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Haribabu Kommi <kommi(dot)haribabu(at)gmail(dot)com>, Rafia Sabih <rafia(dot)sabih(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, tushar <tushar(dot)ahuja(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Amit Khandekar <amitdkhan(dot)pg(at)gmail(dot)com>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Parallel bitmap heap scan
Date: 2017-03-06 05:35:45
Message-ID: CAFiTN-vFVbUYYnDqxLoOydeD9WwjWbfGK6Vq5OCK14xL6K4jrw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Mar 2, 2017 at 6:52 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> 0002 wasn't quite careful enough about the placement of #ifdef
> USE_PREFETCH, but otherwise looks OK. Committed after changing that
> and getting rid of the local variable prefetch_iterator, which seemed
> to be adding rather than removing complexity after this refactoring.

0003 is rebased after this commit.

--
Regards,
Dilip Kumar
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

Attachment Content-Type Size
0003-parallel-bitmap-heapscan-v7.patch application/octet-stream 37.7 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ashutosh Bapat 2017-03-06 05:42:22 Re: dropping partitioned tables without CASCADE
Previous Message Simon Riggs 2017-03-06 05:35:11 Re: dropping partitioned tables without CASCADE