Re: Parallel bitmap heap scan

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Haribabu Kommi <kommi(dot)haribabu(at)gmail(dot)com>, Rafia Sabih <rafia(dot)sabih(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, tushar <tushar(dot)ahuja(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Amit Khandekar <amitdkhan(dot)pg(at)gmail(dot)com>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Parallel bitmap heap scan
Date: 2017-03-02 13:22:39
Message-ID: CA+TgmobaS7sOpFjwoVKREJWrpuca3RfOdtWTpUd40eO9+8+NdA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 9:18 PM, Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> 0001- same as previous with some changes for freeing the shared memory stuff.
> 0002- nodeBitmapHeapScan refactoring, this applies independently
> 0003- actual parallel bitmap stuff applies on top of 0001 and 0002

0002 wasn't quite careful enough about the placement of #ifdef
USE_PREFETCH, but otherwise looks OK. Committed after changing that
and getting rid of the local variable prefetch_iterator, which seemed
to be adding rather than removing complexity after this refactoring.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David Steele 2017-03-02 13:27:40 Re: [PATCH] ALTER DEFAULT PRIVILEGES with GRANT/REVOKE ON SCHEMAS
Previous Message Ashutosh Bapat 2017-03-02 13:18:30 Re: Print correct startup cost for the group aggregate.