Re: OOM in spgist insert

From: Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Pavel Borisov <pashkin(dot)elfe(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: OOM in spgist insert
Date: 2021-05-12 14:45:06
Message-ID: CAFiTN-uyktqwKot-QHJWF2PrEiOv4=H4Kk9uXGHg4HWYAR5oYQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, May 12, 2021 at 5:35 PM Pavel Borisov <pashkin(dot)elfe(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>>
>> INCLUDEd -> why you have used a mixed case here?
>
> It is current practice to call INCLUDE columns in capital, you can find many places in the current code. But case mixture can be avoided indeed ))
> PFA v4

Okay, that makes sense.

--
Regards,
Dilip Kumar
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Justin Pryzby 2021-05-12 15:06:05 Re: PG 14 release notes, first draft
Previous Message Julien Rouhaud 2021-05-12 14:40:46 Re: RFC: Logging plan of the running query