| From: | Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | amul sul <sulamul(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Yugo Nagata <nagata(at)sraoss(dot)co(dot)jp>, David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>, Greg Stark <stark(at)mit(dot)edu>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [POC] hash partitioning |
| Date: | 2017-05-15 15:43:58 |
| Message-ID: | CAFiTN-uxvOUhykiR7Mwpez4fvhnX3gTmtr2ttEXbdEXu7=e6Pg@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, May 15, 2017 at 9:06 PM, Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Test2:
> postgres=# insert into x2 values(100); -- it should violates
> partition constraint
> INSERT 0 1
>
> Seems like a bug or am I missing something completely?
Sorry, my bad. It's modulus on the hashvalue, not the column.
--
Regards,
Dilip Kumar
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2017-05-15 15:49:14 | Re: Create publication syntax is not coming properly in pg_dump / pg_dumpall |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2017-05-15 15:43:47 | Re: [POC] hash partitioning |