Re: Move PinBuffer and UnpinBuffer to atomics

From: Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: Alexander Korotkov <a(dot)korotkov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, YUriy Zhuravlev <u(dot)zhuravlev(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Move PinBuffer and UnpinBuffer to atomics
Date: 2016-03-28 06:18:46
Message-ID: CAFiTN-uvEoyAPQZhPcu5cxTnZhyVmq50w3KmbUHV=s6XDSDV_g@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sun, Mar 27, 2016 at 5:48 PM, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> wrote:

>
> What's sizeof(BufferDesc) after applying these patches? It should better
> be <= 64...
>

It is 72.

--
Regards,
Dilip Kumar
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Masahiko Sawada 2016-03-28 06:59:21 Re: Support for N synchronous standby servers - take 2
Previous Message Dilip Kumar 2016-03-28 06:11:42 Re: Relation extension scalability