| From: | Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, Álvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)kurilemu(dot)de>, "Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu)" <kuroda(dot)hayato(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, "exclusion(at)gmail(dot)com" <exclusion(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: BUG #18988: DROP SUBSCRIPTION locks not-yet-accessed database |
| Date: | 2025-08-18 03:04:51 |
| Message-ID: | CAFiTN-uu5htStpMN+2z6Mjb2-3cjcoD0V50GxqoQ7bHa15h-OQ@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
On Sun, Aug 17, 2025 at 7:23 PM vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> > PFA, updated patches for v13 to head, make check-world is passing for
> > all the branches for v15+ we had upgrade test which also run
> > regression test so we additionally have to set max_wal_senders=1 for
> > 002_pg_upgrade.pl
>
> Do you feel it will be better to append the configurations using
> single call like below:
> -$oldnode->append_conf('postgresql.conf', 'log_statement = none');
> -$oldnode->append_conf('postgresql.conf', 'wal_level = replica');
> -$oldnode->append_conf('postgresql.conf', 'max_wal_senders = 1');
> +$oldnode->append_conf(
> + 'postgresql.conf',
> + qq{log_statement = 'none'
> + wal_level = 'replica'
> + max_wal_senders = 1});
Not sure if one way is superior over another or preferred. I see both
sorts of usage patterns throughout our test suit.
--
Regards,
Dilip Kumar
Google
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | vignesh C | 2025-08-18 03:34:09 | Re: BUG #18988: DROP SUBSCRIPTION locks not-yet-accessed database |
| Previous Message | PG Bug reporting form | 2025-08-17 18:04:22 | BUG #19022: Trying to set up pem server not accepting any passwords |