Re: Move PinBuffer and UnpinBuffer to atomics

From: Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Alexander Korotkov <a(dot)korotkov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, YUriy Zhuravlev <u(dot)zhuravlev(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Move PinBuffer and UnpinBuffer to atomics
Date: 2016-01-19 15:00:17
Message-ID: CAFiTN-utQKQ1sLQodTZp+_wBb=jhz+ze62quOb4B_JxJw-kp4g@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 5:44 PM, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
wrote:

> > Test3:
> > pgbench -i -s 100 postgres
> > pgbench -c$ -j$ -Mprepared -S postgres
> >
> > Client Base Pached
> >
> > 1 20555 19404
> > 32 375919 332670
> > 64 509067 440680
> > 128 431346 415121
> > 256 380926 379176
>
> It seems like you did a copy-paste of the results with s=100 and
> s=300. Both are showing the exact same numbers.

Oops, my mistake, re-pasting the correct results for s=100

pgbench -i -s 100 postgres
pgbench -c$ -j$ -Mprepared -S postgres

Client Base Pached

1 20548 20791
32 372633 355356
64 532052 552148
128 412755 478826
256 346701 372057

--
Regards,
Dilip Kumar
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Дмитрий Сарафанников 2016-01-19 15:30:33 Logical decoding on standby
Previous Message Tom Lane 2016-01-19 14:38:42 Re: COPY (... tab completion