Re: Remove unused variable from SharedSort

From: Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Bharath Rupireddy <bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Remove unused variable from SharedSort
Date: 2020-11-15 10:19:58
Message-ID: CAFiTN-uj=5hFh=f98RWL0gQSoz=zR2f9CVM=dPd0ZzcFWsfkqQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sun, Nov 15, 2020 at 12:50 PM Bharath Rupireddy
<bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Nov 12, 2020 at 5:29 PM Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> >
> > While going through the code I noticed that the nTapes member in
> > SharedSort is unused. This is just initialized with nworkers but
> > never used. The attached patch removes this variable.
> >
>
> We could have used that variable for an assert like
> Assert(state->worker <= shared->nTapes) in worker_freeze_result_tape()
> before accessing shared->tapes[state->worker] = output; as sometimes
> state->worker is being set to -1. But, it seems like we reach
> worker_freeze_result_tape(), only when WORKER(state) is true. So, we
> don't need that extra Assert and removing nTapes variable makes sense
> to me.

Right, but anyway IMHO adding extra shared memory variables for just
and assert purposes doesn't make sense.

> Patch looks good to me. Regression tests make check and make
> check-world ran successfully.

Thanks for looking into this.

--
Regards,
Dilip Kumar
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Erik Rijkers 2020-11-15 10:44:23 Re: Supporting = operator in gin/gist_trgm_ops
Previous Message Li Japin 2020-11-15 10:00:01 Re: Terminate the idle sessions