Re: <> join selectivity estimate question

On Thu, Jun 1, 2017 at 8:24 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 1:18 PM, Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> + if (jointype = JOIN_SEMI)
>> + {
>> + sjinfo->jointype = JOIN_INNER;
>> + }
>
> That is pretty obviously half-baked and completely untested.

Actually, I was not proposing this patch instead I wanted to discuss
the approach. I was claiming that for
non-equal JOIN_SEMI selectivity estimation instead of calculating
selectivity in an existing way i.e
= 1- (selectivity of equal JOIN_SEMI) the better way would be = 1-
(selectivity of equal). I have only tested only standalone scenario
where it solves the problem but not the TPCH cases. But I was more
interested in discussing that the way I am thinking how it should
calculate the nonequal SEMI join selectivity make any sense.

--
Regards,
Dilip Kumar
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com