Re: SLRU optimization - configurable buffer pool and partitioning the SLRU lock

From: Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>
Cc: "Andrey M(dot) Borodin" <x4mmm(at)yandex-team(dot)ru>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: SLRU optimization - configurable buffer pool and partitioning the SLRU lock
Date: 2023-11-17 11:11:24
Message-ID: CAFiTN-ubCKEFzeZji0Frv_7MdhAR4YxY91udqHMQ=DHViy7QnQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Nov 17, 2023 at 1:09 PM Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Nov 16, 2023 at 3:11 PM Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> wrote:

PFA, updated patch version, this fixes the comment given by Alvaro and
also improves some of the comments.

--
Regards,
Dilip Kumar
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

Attachment Content-Type Size
v6-0002-Divide-SLRU-buffers-into-banks.patch application/octet-stream 13.5 KB
v6-0001-Make-all-SLRU-buffer-sizes-configurable.patch application/octet-stream 24.0 KB
v6-0003-Remove-the-centralized-control-lock-and-LRU-count.patch application/octet-stream 74.3 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Drouvot, Bertrand 2023-11-17 11:38:14 Re: Synchronizing slots from primary to standby
Previous Message Heikki Linnakangas 2023-11-17 10:37:21 Re: Relation bulk write facility