| From: | Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi> |
| Cc: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andrey Borodin <x4mmm(at)yandex-team(dot)ru>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Questions/Observations related to Gist vacuum |
| Date: | 2019-10-18 04:11:41 |
| Message-ID: | CAFiTN-uVc-avPfBBjkcz_FpaJXRSpN3fzUqGj3fR4DLmZxidvA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Oct 16, 2019 at 7:22 PM Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi> wrote:
>
> On 16 October 2019 12:57:03 CEST, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> >On Tue, Oct 15, 2019 at 7:13 PM Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>
> >wrote:
> >> All things
> >> considered, I'm not sure which is better.
> >
> >Yeah, this is a tough call to make, but if we can allow it to delete
> >the pages in bulkdelete conditionally for parallel vacuum workers,
> >then it would be better.
>
> Yeah, if it's needed for parallel vacuum, maybe that tips the scale.
Are we planning to do this only if it is called from parallel vacuum
workers or in general?
--
Regards,
Dilip Kumar
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Amit Kapila | 2019-10-18 04:38:46 | Re: SegFault on 9.6.14 |
| Previous Message | Dilip Kumar | 2019-10-18 04:04:28 | Re: Questions/Observations related to Gist vacuum |