From: | Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Nitin Motiani <nitinmotiani(at)google(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [PATCH] Accept connections post recovery without waiting for RemoveOldXlogFiles |
Date: | 2025-09-09 08:37:18 |
Message-ID: | CAFiTN-tyzLF5V8ksS1WCs1-ax3kbmXjtuoSa=8WqTe95aCwPhQ@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Sep 9, 2025 at 1:23 PM Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Sep 8, 2025 at 6:33 PM Nitin Motiani <nitinmotiani(at)google(dot)com> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Hackers,
> >
> > I'd like to propose a patch to allow accepting connections post recovery without waiting for the removal of old xlog files.
>
> As another idea, could crash recovery avoid waiting for the end-of-recovery
> checkpoint itself to finish, similar to archive recovery? In other words,
> crash recovery would write the end-of-recovery WAL record and request
> a checkpoint, but not block until it completes. Thought?
Thanks for your input Fujii. The end-of-recovery checkpoint needs to
set checkpoint.redo to serve as a new recovery starting point. This
prevents a full recovery from the previous checkpoint in the event of
a crash. However, setting checkpoint.redo requires that no other
backend is generating concurrent WAL. For this reason, the
end-of-recovery checkpoint cannot run concurrently.
--
Regards,
Dilip Kumar
Google
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Ashutosh Sharma | 2025-09-09 08:48:55 | Re: Clear logical slot's 'synced' flag on promotion of standby |
Previous Message | Zsolt Parragi | 2025-09-09 08:16:10 | Re: OAuth client code doesn't work with Google OAuth |