Re: Parallel bitmap heap scan

From: Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: tushar <tushar(dot)ahuja(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: Amit Khandekar <amitdkhan(dot)pg(at)gmail(dot)com>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Parallel bitmap heap scan
Date: 2017-01-09 11:06:26
Message-ID: CAFiTN-tN-TNOhtMc8u5rf=_xmG_xH2XTp0-feHENG7oz+E18vg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Jan 9, 2017 at 3:07 PM, tushar <tushar(dot)ahuja(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
> creating directory data ... ok
> creating subdirectories ... ok
> selecting default max_connections ... 100
> selecting default shared_buffers ... 128MB
> selecting dynamic shared memory implementation ... posix
> creating configuration files ... ok
> running bootstrap script ... ok
> performing post-bootstrap initialization ... sh: line 1: 30709 Segmentation
> fault "/home/centos/PG10_9ja/postgresql/edbpsql/bin/postgres" --single -F -O
> -j -c search_path=pg_catalog -c exit_on_error=true template1 > /dev/null
> child process exited with exit code 139
> initdb: removing data directory "data"

I have taken the latest code, applied all 3 patches and compiled.
Initdb is working fine for me.

Can you please verify, do you have any extra patch along with my patch?
Did you properly clean the code?

I have asked one of my colleague to verify this and the result is
same, No crash.

--
Regards,
Dilip Kumar
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message tushar 2017-01-09 11:31:31 Re: Parallel bitmap heap scan
Previous Message tushar 2017-01-09 09:37:39 Re: Parallel bitmap heap scan