| From: | Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [Proposal] Fully WAL logged CREATE DATABASE - No Checkpoints |
| Date: | 2022-02-09 15:58:52 |
| Message-ID: | CAFiTN-tFm3Ecp=LiNQSQv0j7VR22UBb5tQNa+iUUqTggi4_sEA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Feb 9, 2022 at 9:25 PM Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> wrote:
>
>
> On 6/16/21 03:52, Dilip Kumar wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 15, 2021 at 7:01 PM Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> wrote:
> >> Rather than use size, I'd be inclined to say use this if the source
> >> database is marked as a template, and use the copydir approach for
> >> anything that isn't.
> > Yeah, that is possible, on the other thought wouldn't it be good to
> > provide control to the user by providing two different commands, e.g.
> > COPY DATABASE for the existing method (copydir) and CREATE DATABASE
> > for the new method (fully wal logged)?
> >
>
>
> This proposal seems to have gotten lost.
Yeah, I am planning to work on this part so that we can support both methods.
--
Regards,
Dilip Kumar
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2022-02-09 16:00:06 | Re: [Proposal] Fully WAL logged CREATE DATABASE - No Checkpoints |
| Previous Message | Dilip Kumar | 2022-02-09 15:56:23 | Re: [Proposal] Fully WAL logged CREATE DATABASE - No Checkpoints |