Re: Concurrency bug in UPDATE of partition-key

On Mon, Jun 18, 2018 at 6:19 PM, Amit Khandekar <amitdkhan(dot)pg(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On 18 June 2018 at 17:56, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> On Mon, Jun 18, 2018 at 11:28 AM, Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>>> Should we also create a test case where we can verify that some
>>> unnecessary or duplicate triggers are not executed?
>>>
>>
>> I am not sure how much value we will add by having such a test. In
>> general, it is good to have tests that cover various aspects of
>> functionality, but OTOH, we have to be careful to not overdo it.
>
> Actually I am thinking, it's not a big deal adding a RAISE statement
> in trigger function in the existing testcases. It will clearly show how
> many times the trigger has executed. So I will go ahead and do that.

Ok, That makes sense to me.

--
Regards,
Dilip Kumar
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com