From: | Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
Cc: | Dilip Kumar <dilip(dot)kumar(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Undo logs |
Date: | 2018-11-14 06:38:01 |
Message-ID: | CAFiTN-stTdm-1mpWD5_WyWRG-9o02gBU5uiXvUFjzXWiPkMr9Q@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Nov 5, 2018 at 5:09 PM Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Sep 3, 2018 at 11:26 AM Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> Thomas has already posted the latest version of undo log patches on
> 'Cleaning up orphaned files using undo logs' thread[1]. So I have
> rebased the undo-interface patch also. This patch also includes
> latest defect fixes from the main zheap branch [2].
>
Hi Thomas,
The latest patch for undo log storage is not compiling on the head, I
think it needs to be rebased due to your commit related to "pg_pread()
and pg_pwrite() for data files and WAL"
--
Regards,
Dilip Kumar
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Thomas Munro | 2018-11-14 07:22:42 | Re: DSM segment handle generation in background workers |
Previous Message | Peter Geoghegan | 2018-11-14 06:28:05 | Re: Fixing findDependentObjects()'s dependency on scan order (regressions in DROP diagnostic messages) |