| From: | Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | shveta malik <shveta(dot)malik(at)gmail(dot)com>, Bertrand Drouvot <bertranddrouvot(dot)pg(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Zhijie Hou (Fujitsu)" <houzj(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com>, Nisha Moond <nisha(dot)moond412(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu)" <kuroda(dot)hayato(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, Bharath Rupireddy <bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Ashutosh Sharma <ashu(dot)coek88(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Ajin Cherian <itsajin(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Synchronizing slots from primary to standby |
| Date: | 2024-01-08 06:09:39 |
| Message-ID: | CAFiTN-skn=ffyC8PMzg7gfpyNLfx7v9roae-+W8HYbpzoO0mkg@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Jan 5, 2024 at 5:45 PM Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jan 5, 2024 at 4:25 PM Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Jan 5, 2024 at 8:59 AM shveta malik <shveta(dot)malik(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > >
> > I was going the the patch set again, I have a question. The below
> > comments say that we keep the failover option as PENDING until we have
> > done the initial table sync which seems fine. But what happens if we
> > add a new table to the publication and refresh the subscription? In
> > such a case does this go back to the PENDING state or something else?
> >
>
> At this stage, such an operation is prohibited. Users need to disable
> the failover option first, then perform the above operation, and after
> that failover option can be re-enabled.
Okay, that makes sense to me.
--
Regards,
Dilip Kumar
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | David G. Johnston | 2024-01-08 06:17:38 | Re: alter table add x wrong error position |
| Previous Message | Tristan Partin | 2024-01-08 06:03:45 | Re: psql not responding to SIGINT upon db reconnection |