From: | Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com>, Álvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)kurilemu(dot)de>, "Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu)" <kuroda(dot)hayato(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, "exclusion(at)gmail(dot)com" <exclusion(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: BUG #18988: DROP SUBSCRIPTION locks not-yet-accessed database |
Date: | 2025-08-14 11:34:02 |
Message-ID: | CAFiTN-sdGvXjmAMym6Rm4stDpmRsF0qBLknpuAgzT73=MBa3Mw@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
On Thu, Aug 14, 2025 at 4:32 PM Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Aug 14, 2025 at 2:18 PM Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Aug 14, 2025 at 2:05 PM Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > >
> > > Yeah this looks fine to me. PFA patches for back branches.
> > >
> >
> > Can we add a test based on the scenario reported in this email?
>
> At first, I thought we can just add this test in subscription.sql, but
> IMHO we should not do that because after testing DROP SUBSCRIPTION
> give error we should eventually DROP the subscription for cleanup by
> creating the slot and enabling the subscription (as shown below[1])
> but I that realized during regression wal_level is not logical so we
> are not allowed to create the logical slot. So maybe we should write
> it in 100_bugs.pl? Am I missing something?
>
Another alternative is for cleanup instead of creating a missing slot
we can just set the slot_name=NONE and then drop. I will move ahead
with this approach.
--
Regards,
Dilip Kumar
Google
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Thomas Munro | 2025-08-15 05:39:30 | Re: Potential deadlock in pgaio_io_wait() |
Previous Message | Álvaro Herrera | 2025-08-14 11:09:38 | Re: Empty query_id in pg_stat_activity |