Re: Relation extension scalability

From: Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Petr Jelinek <petr(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Jim Nasby <Jim(dot)Nasby(at)bluetreble(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Relation extension scalability
Date: 2016-03-18 09:08:18
Message-ID: CAFiTN-sUs8mQ=zzdReDaUpaxzGS7MabWf3YaN=np6XJtusWx+w@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 1:31 PM, Petr Jelinek <petr(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:

> Great.
>
> Just small notational thing, maybe this would be simpler?:
> extraBlocks = Min(512, lockWaiters * 20);
>

Done, new patch attached.

--
Regards,
Dilip Kumar
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

Attachment Content-Type Size
multi_extend_v9.patch text/x-patch 9.4 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Etsuro Fujita 2016-03-18 09:15:51 Re: Optimization for updating foreign tables in Postgres FDW
Previous Message Shulgin, Oleksandr 2016-03-18 08:46:26 Re: pg_hba_lookup function to get all matching pg_hba.conf entries