Re: PATCH: logical_work_mem and logical streaming of large in-progress transactions

From: Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Erik Rijkers <er(at)xs4all(dot)nl>, Kuntal Ghosh <kuntalghosh(dot)2007(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: PATCH: logical_work_mem and logical streaming of large in-progress transactions
Date: 2020-07-13 05:09:43
Message-ID: CAFiTN-sRFOd9Yd69b86ZMn6CH2T-Xiob54CkVFpR9EYjocWJJQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Jul 13, 2020 at 10:14 AM Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jul 10, 2020 at 3:37 PM Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> >
> > On Sat, Jul 4, 2020 at 11:35 AM Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > 8. We can't stream the transaction before we reach the
> > > SNAPBUILD_CONSISTENT state because some other output plugin can apply
> > > those changes unlike what we do with pgoutput plugin (which writes to
> > > file). And, I think applying the transactions without reaching a
> > > consistent state would be anyway wrong. So, we should avoid that and
> > > if do that then we should have an Assert for streamed txns rather than
> > > sending abort for them in ReorderBufferForget.
> >
> > I was analyzing this point so currently, we only enable streaming in
> > StartReplicationSlot so basically in CreateReplicationSlot the
> > streaming will be always off because by that time plugins are not yet
> > startup that will happen only on StartReplicationSlot.
> >
>
> What do you mean by 'startup' in the above sentence? AFAICS, we do
> call startup_cb_wrapper in CreateInitDecodingContext which is called
> from both CreateReplicationSlot and create_logical_replication_slot
> before the start of decoding. In CreateInitDecodingContext, we call
> StartupDecodingContext which should load the plugin.

Yeah, you are right that we do call startup_cb_wrapper from
CreateInitDecodingContext as well. I think I got confused by below
comment in patch 0007

@@ -1016,6 +1016,12 @@ CreateReplicationSlot(CreateReplicationSlotCmd *cmd)
WalSndPrepareWrite, WalSndWriteData,
WalSndUpdateProgress);
+ /*
+ * Make sure streaming is disabled here - we may have the methods,
+ * but we don't have anywhere to send the data yet.
+ */
+ ctx->streaming = false;
+

Basically, during CreateReplicationSlot we forcefully disable the
streaming with the comment "we don't have anywhere to send the data
yet". So my point is during CreateReplicationSlot time the streaming
will always be off and once we are done with creating the slot we will
be having consistent snapshot. So my point is can we just check that
while decoding unless the current LSN reaches the start_decoding_at
point we should not start streaming and after that we can start. At
that time we can have an assert that the snapshot should be
CONSISTENT. However, before doing that I need to check on this point
that why after creating slot we are setting ctx->streaming to false.

--
Regards,
Dilip Kumar
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Fujii Masao 2020-07-13 05:11:05 Re: max_slot_wal_keep_size and wal_keep_segments
Previous Message Amit Kapila 2020-07-13 04:43:51 Re: PATCH: logical_work_mem and logical streaming of large in-progress transactions