Re: generalized conveyor belt storage

From: Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Amul Sul <sulamul(at)gmail(dot)com>, Matthias van de Meent <boekewurm+postgres(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: generalized conveyor belt storage
Date: 2022-01-26 12:29:50
Message-ID: CAFiTN-sQUddO9JPiH3tz+vbNqRqi_pgndecy8k2yXAnO3ymqZA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Jan 5, 2022 at 1:13 AM Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
>
> Updated patch attached, also with a fix for the mistake in the readme
> that Matthias found, and a few other bug fixes.

Rebased over the current master. Basically, I rebased for other patch
sets I am planning to post for heap and index vacuum decoupling.

--
Regards,
Dilip Kumar
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

Attachment Content-Type Size
v3-0001-WIP-Conveyor-belt-storage.patch application/octet-stream 200.7 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Petr Jelinek 2022-01-26 13:01:25 Re: logical decoding and replication of sequences
Previous Message Julien Rouhaud 2022-01-26 11:03:00 Re: Replace uses of deprecated Python module distutils.sysconfig