Re: Move PinBuffer and UnpinBuffer to atomics

From: Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: Alexander Korotkov <a(dot)korotkov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, YUriy Zhuravlev <u(dot)zhuravlev(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Move PinBuffer and UnpinBuffer to atomics
Date: 2016-03-27 12:15:52
Message-ID: CAFiTN-s95n8WT7Xm6NSymxCPkodiZbpDn2M3x72KN=HEQLdLEQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sun, Mar 27, 2016 at 5:37 PM, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> wrote:

> On what hardware did you run these tests?

IBM POWER 8 MACHINE.

Architecture: ppc64le
Byte Order: Little Endian
CPU(s): 192
Thread(s) per core: 8
Core(s) per socket: 1
Socket(s): 24
NUMA node(s): 4

--
Regards,
Dilip Kumar
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2016-03-27 12:18:58 Re: Move PinBuffer and UnpinBuffer to atomics
Previous Message Andres Freund 2016-03-27 12:15:50 Re: Performance degradation in commit 6150a1b0