| From: | Alexander Kukushkin <cyberdemn(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | shveta malik <shveta(dot)malik(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Fabrice Chapuis <fabrice636861(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Shlok Kyal <shlok(dot)kyal(dot)oss(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: Issue with logical replication slot during switchover |
| Date: | 2025-10-28 13:03:00 |
| Message-ID: | CAFh8B=nWryz6aHfobaXXpEGjFoq0eLTyB05dP2G_ZFP6cXGxCg@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi all,
I don't think we really need to have allow_overwrite.
It is not possible to create logical slots on standby with failover=true,
therefore we can safely rely on failover being true to understand that at
some point this node was a primary and that this slot is supposed to be
synced.
Please see the patch attached.
Regards,
--
Alexander Kukushkin
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| 0001-Continue-slots-synchronization-after-switchover.patch | text/x-patch | 3.1 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Michael Paquier | 2025-10-28 13:04:20 | Re: Add wal_fpi_bytes_[un]compressed to pg_stat_wal |
| Previous Message | BharatDB | 2025-10-28 12:51:41 | Re: Checkpointer write combining |