Re: Issue with logical replication slot during switchover

From: Alexander Kukushkin <cyberdemn(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Fabrice Chapuis <fabrice636861(at)gmail(dot)com>, shveta malik <shveta(dot)malik(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Shlok Kyal <shlok(dot)kyal(dot)oss(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Issue with logical replication slot during switchover
Date: 2025-11-13 09:06:53
Message-ID: CAFh8B=msLPygQXKHT2oXWbwYC8rbN8iMrgRsQOovW+W3Uv5NyQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi Amit,

On Thu, 13 Nov 2025 at 09:42, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:

>
> Say, the only operations that happened are slot-drop-recreate and or
> some operations on unlogged tables. Why then pg_rewind is required?

Clean shut down always writes checkpoint record to WAL and updates
pg_control.

Regards,
--
Alexander Kukushkin

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message shveta malik 2025-11-13 09:09:02 Re: Proposal: Conflict log history table for Logical Replication
Previous Message Amit Kapila 2025-11-13 08:42:36 Re: Issue with logical replication slot during switchover