| From: | Stefan Keller <sfkeller(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Jim Nasby <jim(at)nasby(dot)net> |
| Cc: | pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Summaries on SSD usage? |
| Date: | 2011-09-01 22:15:51 |
| Message-ID: | CAFcOn28Y-6cz=vxgEwdFR7QQoxMM_cm5iot1MzgiX7xk+3byVA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-performance |
You mean something like "Unlogged Tables" in PostgreSQL 9.1 (=
in-memory database) or simply a large ramdisk?
Yours, Stefan
2011/9/1 Jim Nasby <jim(at)nasby(dot)net>:
> On Aug 30, 2011, at 12:23 PM, Stefan Keller wrote:
>> I'm looking for summaries (or best practices) on SSD usage with PostgreSQL.
>> My use case is mainly a "read-only" database.
>> Are there any around?
>
> I'm not sure, but for read-only why not just put more memory in the server? It'll be a lot cheaper than SSDs.
> --
> Jim C. Nasby, Database Architect jim(at)nasby(dot)net
> 512.569.9461 (cell) http://jim.nasby.net
>
>
>
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2011-09-01 23:13:56 | Re: 8.4 optimization regression? |
| Previous Message | Jim Nasby | 2011-09-01 21:28:22 | Re: Summaries on SSD usage? |